TTCA-24 shows excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC 0.78–0.87) but has only one published study in this context and correlates only weakly with T-NOTECHS¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 DeMoor et al. reported ICCs of 0.87 (stable) and 0.78 (unstable) for TTCA-24, and a Spearman correlation with T-NOTECHS of r = 0.261 (p = 0.029) with no significant correlation with TEAM. → Alexander Emily G 2023

Evidence¶

Alexander Emily G 2023¶

Alexander Emily G, Denny Fraser, Gordon Malcom WG, McKiernan Cieran, Lowe David J. (2023). Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review. BMC Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7

q2 · i2 · review · r2

The review reports DeMoor et al.'s single-centre observational study of 70 trauma resuscitations assessing concurrent validity; the printed correlation is "r = 0.261" with T-NOTECHS, significant at p = 0.029, and no significant correlation with TEAM. ICCs of 0.87 and 0.78 indicate excellent reliability.

"The Spearman rank correlation coefficient between TTCA-24 and T-NOTECHS is r = 0.261, demonstrating positive correlation that was statistically significant (p = 0.029). There was no statistically significant correlation between TTCA-24 and TEAM."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A systematic review of ED resuscitation video review identified four unique NTS assessment tools, with T-NOTECHS used in six of nine studies — a broader claim this one bears on
• T-NOTECHS inter-rater reliability varies widely across ED video-review studies, from moderate (ICC 0.48) to excellent (ICC 0.94) — related