Claims

Higher TORR scores, especially antinomy, predict more creative engineering design solutions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Engineering design students with higher TORR scores, especially on the antinomy scale, produced more creative solutions to engineering design problems. → Patricia A Alexander 2016

Evidence

Patricia A Alexander 2016

Patricia A Alexander. (2016). Relational thinking and relational reasoning: harnessing the power of patterning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.4

q2 · i? · associational · r?

Study of engineering design students reported in the article's in vitro section, associating TORR performance with creative design solutions. The association was strongest for the antinomy scale; no effect size is printed.

"Dumas and Schmidt 63 determined that those with higher TORR scores, especially for the antinomy scale, produced more creative solutions to engineering design problems."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id torr-predicts-creative-engineering-design
title Higher TORR scores, especially antinomy, predict more creative engineering design solutions
description Higher TORR scores, especially antinomy, predict more creative engineering design solutions
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
source_checked 2026-10-26
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patricia-a-alexander-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.