Claims

TORR scores correlate positively with Raven's Matrices scores but are more difficult for participants

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? TORR performance shows a significant positive correlation with Raven's Matrices performance, while the TORR proved more difficult for participants than the Raven's. → Patricia A Alexander 2016

Evidence

Patricia A Alexander 2016

Patricia A Alexander. (2016). Relational thinking and relational reasoning: harnessing the power of patterning. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjscilearn.2016.4

q2 · i? · review · r2

Psychometric analysis of the TORR against the Raven's Matrices, reported in the article's summary of its in vitro laboratory investigations. The article reports "a signi ficant positive correlation" between the two measures and greater TORR difficulty; no effect size is printed.

"We determined that there was a signi ficant positive correlation between these two presumed measures of relational reasoning, and that the TORR was more dif ficult for participants than the Raven’s."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id torr-correlates-with-ravens-but-more-difficult
title TORR scores correlate positively with Raven's Matrices scores but are more difficult for participants
description TORR scores correlate positively with Raven's Matrices scores but are more difficult for participants
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2016
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — patricia-a-alexander-2016

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.