Most reviewed games target cultural tourism and augmented visit contexts, with few designed for classrooms or professional training¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 18 (52.94%) of the reviewed games are for cultural tourism and augmented visit, while only 4 (11.76%) suit a school classroom and 2 (5.88%) are training tools for heritage professionals. → Malegiannaki 2017

Evidence¶

Malegiannaki 2017¶

Malegiannaki, I. & Daradoumis, T. (2017). Analyzing the educational design, use and effect of spatial games for cultural heritage: a Literature Review. Computers & Education, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.01.007

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's context-of-use categorization reports "18 (52,94%) are games for cultural tourism and augmented visit", with far fewer for classrooms or professional training.

"In the category of games for non-formal educational settings, 10 (29,41%) of the games can be used in public displays and 18 (52,94%) are games for cultural tourism and augmented visit, also called mobile location-based games (Avouris & Yiannoutsou, 2012), designed to enhance the visitors' interaction with the cultural content, while they move in a cultural site (Mortara et al., 2014a)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Education is the most common application domain for assessed serious games, with 53 of the reviewed games (52%) in formal education — related