Claims

Traditional teaching produced no statistically significant change in attitude toward physics in the control group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group showed no significant pre-to-post difference in attitude toward physics (t = 1.190 < 2.042, df = 31); equivalence was not tested. → Hameed 2016

Evidence

Hameed 2016

Hameed, Saddam Mohammed; Mohammed, Essam Mahmoud. (2016). Enrich the Physics Curriculum Scheduled for Students of Intermediate School E-Learning and Its Effectiveness in Scientific Thinking and Their Attitude Towards the Development of Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.7, No.17. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105303

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t-test on the attitude scale for the 32-student control group: post mean 59.812 versus pre 59.343. The article reports "no significant difference between the mean scores of the development of the tribal trend and post test of co ntrol group"; no effect size is printed.

"calculated t (1.190) is less than the tabulated t (2.042) at level of (0.05 ) and the degree of freedom (31) This means that there is no significant difference between the mean scores of the development of the tribal trend and post test of co ntrol group"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.