Claims

In the experimental group the share of teachers with adequate self-esteem rose to 58% and low self-esteem fell to 13% during the training program, while the control group stayed the same

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? During the forming stage the experimental group moved from predominantly high or low self-esteem toward adequate self-esteem (58%), with only 13% still low, while control-group results did not change. → Shakuto et al. 2016

Evidence

Shakuto et al. 2016

Elena A. Shakuto, Evgenij M. Dorozhkin and Anastasia A. Kozlova. (2016). Management of Teacher Scientific-Methodical Work in Vocational Educational Institutions on the Basis of Project-Target Approach. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(16), 8834-8845. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Ascertaining-stage data showed 57% of teachers with high self-esteem, 18% adequate and 25% low; after the forming stage the article reports "58 % of the teachers reached an ad equate self -esteem" in the experimental group. No effect size or significance test is printed.

"Within the forming stage during the teacher training program in the experimental group 58 % of the teachers reached an ad equate self -esteem, and only 13 % of the teachers still possessed a low self-esteem."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.