Critical-reflective thinking training reduces the tendency to commit the fundamental attribution error on in-context measurements during murder case two¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Participants who received critical-reflective thinking training gave fewer FAE-biased responses on in-context measurements than no-training participants (η² = 0.16). → Poos 2017
Evidence¶
Poos 2017¶
Poos, J., van den Bosch, K. & Janssen, C.P. (2017). Battling bias: Effects of training and training context. Computers & Education, vol. 111, pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.004
q3 · i3 · causal · r2
In a 2 (Training) x 2 (Context) between-subjects experiment with 80 participants, a two-way ANOVA on in-context FAE scores during murder case two showed a significant main effect of Training (η² = 0.16); trained participants made fewer biased responses ("M ¼ 0.10,SD ¼ 0.1 1") than untrained participants (M = 0.22, SD = 0.16).
"Analysis revealed a signi ficant main effect of Training ( F (1,73) ¼ 14.12, p < 0.01, h2 ¼ 0.16). As Fig. 1 shows, par- ticipants in the Training conditions ( M ¼ 0.10,SD ¼ 0.1 1) gave fewer FAE-biased judgments and decisions than participants in the No-Training conditions (M ¼ 0.22, SD ¼ 0.16)."
Poos 2017 (2)¶
Poos, J., van den Bosch, K. & Janssen, C.P. (2017). Battling bias: Effects of training and training context. Computers & Education, vol. 111, pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.004
q3 · i? · causal · r2
The same ANOVA on in-context FAE scores found no significant main effect of Context and no Training x Context interaction; equivalence was not tested.
"We found no significant main effect of Context (F (1,73) ¼ 0.80, p ¼ 0.37), nor an interaction effect between Training and Context ( F (1,73) ¼ 0.64, p ¼ 0.43)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Fundamental-attribution-error training effects did not transfer to independent out-context posttests — related
- Training did not reduce confirmation bias on in-context measurements embedded in the second murder case — related
- Training in critical-reflective thinking produced no change on the Cognitive Reflection Test — related
- Contrasting examples, correct examples, erroneous examples, and practice problems produced no differences in learning gains or transfer of unbiased-reasoning skills — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.