Claims

Children in the PBS KIDS Transmedia Math Supplement condition scored significantly higher on the Supplement-based Assessment than children in the Technology & Media condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i1 Children in the Math Supplement condition exhibited significantly higher SBA scores than children in the Technology & Media condition (1.43 points, effect size 0.22, p<.001). → Llorente 2015

Evidence

Llorente 2015

Llorente, C., Pasnik, S., Moorthy, S., Hupert, N., Rosenfeld, D., & Gerard, S. (2015). Preschool Teachers Can Use a PBS KIDS Transmedia Curriculum Supplement to Support Young Children's Mathematics Learning: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. SREE Spring 2015 Conference Abstract. https://sree.org/conferences/2015-conference/

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Randomized controlled trial with 85 classrooms randomly assigned to three conditions; impact estimates from the main effects model (Table 3) show the Supplement vs Technology & Media contrast on the SBA was "1.43 points, effect size of 0.22, p<. 001", described as significant.

"Children in the PBS KIDS Transmedia Math Supplement condition exhibited significantly higher SBA scores than children in the Technology & Media condition (1.43 points, effect size of 0.22, p<. 001)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.