Claims

The interaction of treatment and gender has no statistically significant effect on achievement in algebraic word problems

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 The treatment by gender interaction was not statistically significant (partial eta squared = 0.019). → Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015

Evidence

Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati 2015

Josiah Owolabi & Tobiloba Faith Adaramati. (2015). Effects of Graphic Organiser on Students' Achievement in Algebraic Word Problems. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1083649

q2 · i1 · causal · r1

ANCOVA interaction term (treatment*gender) on post-test achievement in the non-equivalent group design. The article reports no significant interaction, with partial Eta squared of 0.019, implying the interaction accounts for 1.9% of variance.

"Table 4 also showed that there was no significant i nteraction between treatment and gender on students ' mean achievement in algebraic word problem. {F (0.304) = 0.740, p > 0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.