Claims

Treatment and verbal ability interact significantly in their effect on students’ interest in mathematics

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 The interaction effect of treatment and verbal ability on interest in mathematics was significant, with a small printed effect size (partial eta squared = 0.033). → Frederick-Jonah 2015

Evidence

Frederick-Jonah 2015

Frederick-Jonah, T. M. & Igbojinwaekwu, P. C. (2015). Effectiveness of Game and Poem Enhanced Instructional Strategies and Verbal Ability on Students’ Interest in Mathematics Learning. Journal of Research in Education, 25(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098014

q2 · i1 · causal · r2

ANCOVA interaction test in the 3 x 3 factorial quasi-experiment; the article reports the interaction was "significant" with "partial eta squared=0.033".

"Table 7 reveals that the interaction effect is significant on students’ interest in mathematics, F (4.334) =2.489; p<0.05; partial eta squared=0.033. The effect size is 3.3%."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.