Claims

The treatment group's vocabulary size increased significantly from pre-test to post-test, by about 17 correct answers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Within the treatment group, post-test vocabulary size was significantly higher than pre-test vocabulary size. → Altay 2017

Evidence

Altay 2017

Mehmet ALTAY. (2017). Raising Awareness of Lexical Semantic Relations in Undergraduate EFL Context. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 11(1), 42-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1167230

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired Samples t-Test comparing the treatment group's pre-test (mean 5380.000) and post-test (mean 8910.000) Vocabulary Size Test scores, reported in Table 14. The article reports "a significant difference between the pre-test scores and the post-test scores of the treatment group".

"there is a significant difference between the pre-test scores and the post-test scores of the treatment group (t19 = -10,5730, p ≤ ,05). Moreover, it is understood that the degree of this difference is around 17 correct answers"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.