Claims

Struggling English learners in TRI classrooms significantly outperformed control struggling ELs on spring Word Attack (g = .45)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Controlling for fall performance, struggling ELs in TRI classrooms scored significantly higher on spring Word Attack than control struggling ELs, with Hedges's g = .45. → Steven J. Amendum 2018

Evidence

Steven J. Amendum 2018

Steven J. Amendum, Mary Bratsch-Hines, Lynne Vernon-Feagans. (2018). Investigating the Efficacy of a Web-Based Early Reading and Professional Development Intervention for Young English Learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.188

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Two-level HLM ANCOVA from the same classroom-randomized RCT of 108 ELs, controlling fall performance, grade, gender, and SES. The article reports the treatment group "gaining 11.12 points across the year (p = .04, g = .45)".

"treatment struggling ELs had significantly higher spring Word Attack scores (conditioned on fall scores) than control struggling ELs did, gaining 11.12 points across the year (p = .04, g = .45)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.