Claims

Momentary anxiety, enjoyment, and boredom are strongly coupled within persons, including an unexpected positive enjoyment–boredom coupling

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 Higher-than-usual anxiety coincided with lower enjoyment (rwithin ≈ −0.41) and lower boredom (rwithin ≈ −0.28), while higher enjoyment coincided with higher boredom (rwithin ≈ +0.61). → Wang 2026

Evidence

Wang 2026

Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2026). Learning proximal cyclic sighing buffers anxiety across learning moments and boredom across days. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00446-2

q2 · i2 · causal · r2

Multivariate multilevel model of pooled EMA data (n = 84) controlling for time-of-day and contextual factors, extracting within-person residual correlations among the three emotions. The printed within-person effect sizes are rwithin ≈ −0.41 (anxiety–enjoyment), rwithin ≈ −0.28 (anxiety–boredom), and rwithin ≈ +0.61 (enjoyment–boredom), the last described as unexpected; the article calls the emotions "an interdependent system".

"higher-than-usual anxiety coincided with lower enjoyment (rwithin ≈ −0.41) and lower boredom (rwithin ≈ −0.28). Somewhat unexpectedly, higher-than-usual enjoyment coincided with higher boredom (rwithin ≈ +0.61)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.