Claims

During breathwork, heart-rate coupling to anxiety and enjoyment weakened, and this altered affect–physiology coupling persisted into the post-intervention phase

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Network Comparison Test showed structural change from baseline to intervention (M = 0.11, p = .030); HR–anxiety and HR–enjoyment edges differed significantly (both p < .02), and no reversion occurred by post (M = 0.03, p = .95). → Wang 2026

Evidence

Wang 2026

Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2026). Learning proximal cyclic sighing buffers anxiety across learning moments and boredom across days. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00446-2

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Exploratory, non-preregistered Gaussian graphical models of anxiety, enjoyment, boredom and heart rate within the breathwork group (n = 47), compared across phases with the Network Comparison Test. Global strength did not differ (p = .26); edge tests localized change to HR–anxiety and HR–enjoyment links (both p < .02), with no reversion by Post (M = 0.03, p = .95).

"The NCT indicated a significant structural change from Baseline to Intervention (M = 0.11, p = .030), suggesting that the pattern of covariation among affective states and HR shifted when participants were practicing breathwork."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.