Claims

TTS-group learners reported becoming aware of differences in RPT pronunciation in post-study interviews

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Most participants, particularly in the TTS Group, reported in interviews that they had become aware of differences in regular past tense pronunciation. → Cardoso 2018

Evidence

Cardoso 2018

Cardoso, W. (2018). Learning L2 pronunciation with a text-to-speech synthesizer. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.806

q1 · i? · qualitative · r2

Qualitative analysis of a 20-minute posttest oral interview, audio-recorded, transcribed, and categorized into themes such as morphophonemic awareness. Learners reported, for example, "I never knew that the {ed} sometimes sounds strong, sometimes weak".

"That many learners became aware of RPT allomorphy became evident in the analysis of their interview data, particularly among participants in the TTS Group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.