TTS-group learners reported becoming aware of differences in RPT pronunciation in post-study interviews¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q1
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Most participants, particularly in the TTS Group, reported in interviews that they had become aware of differences in regular past tense pronunciation. → Cardoso 2018
Evidence¶
Cardoso 2018¶
Cardoso, W. (2018). Learning L2 pronunciation with a text-to-speech synthesizer. In P. Taalas, J. Jalkanen, L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds), Future-proof CALL: language learning as exploration and encounters – short papers from EUROCALL 2018. Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2018.26.806
q1 · i? · qualitative · r2
Qualitative analysis of a 20-minute posttest oral interview, audio-recorded, transcribed, and categorized into themes such as morphophonemic awareness. Learners reported, for example, "I never knew that the {ed} sometimes sounds strong, sometimes weak".
"That many learners became aware of RPT allomorphy became evident in the analysis of their interview data, particularly among participants in the TTS Group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- RPT allomorphs are acquired in the order id>d>t, with significant improvement only for -d — related
- TTS-based instruction and teacher-led instruction produce similar RPT production outcomes in EFL learners — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.