In one randomized trial, EBP leadership education improved EBP beliefs and implementation self-efficacy but not evidence-based nursing practice scores¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In one randomized waitlist-controlled trial, EBP beliefs improved (mean difference 8.75) and implementation self-efficacy improved (mean difference 13.06), both statistically significant. → Varpula Jaakko 2026
q2 i? In one study, evidence-based nursing practice showed a non-significant mean difference of 0.33 between baseline and post-intervention. → Varpula Jaakko 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Varpula Jaakko 2026¶
Varpula Jaakko, Askola Riitta, Kahsay Desale Tewelde, Axelin Anna, Virtanen Laura, Maijala Riikka, Peltonen Laura‐Maria. (2026). Enhancing Nurse Leaders Evidence‐Based Practice Implementation Leadership Competence. A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Educational Interventions. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.70164
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Narratively summarized outcome from one study (Tucker et al. 2022) using the EBP Beliefs Scale; the review reports the unstandardized "mean difference of 8.75" with p < 0.0016. A separate ISE4EBP outcome showed a mean difference of 13.06 (2.84, 23.28, p < 0.0123). No standardized effect size printed.
"A mean difference of 8.75 (3.33, 14.17 95% CI, p < 0.0016) was found between baseline and post‐intervention."
Varpula Jaakko 2026 (2)¶
Varpula Jaakko, Askola Riitta, Kahsay Desale Tewelde, Axelin Anna, Virtanen Laura, Maijala Riikka, Peltonen Laura‐Maria. (2026). Enhancing Nurse Leaders Evidence‐Based Practice Implementation Leadership Competence. A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Educational Interventions. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.70164
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Narratively summarized outcome from one study (Caramanica and Spiva 2018) using the Evidence-Based Nursing Practice Questionnaire; the review reports a "non‐significant mean difference of 0.33" with a confidence interval crossing zero. No standardized effect size printed.
"Evidence‐based nursing practice was assessed in one study using the Evidence‐Based Nursing Practice Questionnaire, which found a non‐significant mean difference of 0.33 (−0.11, 0.77 95% CI) between baseline and post‐intervention (Caramanica and Spiva 2018)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Efficacy — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Educational interventions substantially improve nurse leaders' EBP competence (SMD = 1.76) — related
- Educational interventions significantly improve nurse leaders' EBP implementation leadership (SMD = 0.74) — related
- Educational interventions improve nurse leaders' EBP knowledge (SMD = 1.05) — related
- Certainty of evidence for all outcomes was rated low due to serious risk of bias and heterogeneity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.