Claims

Schools involved in qualitative interviews were positive about the tuition, keen to work with the Tutor Trust again, and confident it benefited their pupils

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Senior leaders and teachers interviewed across eight case-study schools were positive about the tuition and largely confident it was beneficial for their pupils. → Buchanan 2015

Evidence

Buchanan 2015

Buchanan, E., Morrison, J., Walker, M., Aston, H., & Cook, R. (2015). Tutor Trust Secondary: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581539

q2 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative process evaluation based on interviews with senior leaders, classroom teachers, tutors and pupils in eight secondary schools serving challenging communities, with three schools revisited across the three phases. The report also states a large majority of senior leaders interviewed were keen to work with the Tutor Trust again. Perceptions only; no attainment test supports this finding.

"Schools involved in the qualitative interviews were positive about the tuition, keen to work with the Tutor Trust again, and largely confident that the tuition was beneficial for their pupils."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.