The size of tutoring programs' effects on student math knowledge aligned with the quality of their implementation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Programs with moderate to large effects had high student attendance, necessary staffing, and logistics such as scheduling in place, while programs with smaller effects faced implementation challenges and lower attendance. → Kate Place 2023
Evidence¶
Kate Place 2023¶
Kate Place, Andrew Gothro, Gregory Chojnacki, Kara Conroy. (2023). Testing New Approaches to Math Tutoring: Lessons from Eight Evaluations. Mathematica. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/testing-new-approaches-to-math-tutoring-lessons-from-eight-evaluations
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Cross-program comparison across the eight tutoring evaluations. The brief states "The size of programs’ effects on student knowledge aligned with the quality of their implementation," contrasting moderate-to-large-effect programs with smaller-effect programs. No effect sizes or attendance statistics are printed in the brief.
"The size of programs’ effects on student knowledge aligned with the quality of their implementation. Programs with moderate to large effects had high student attendance, the necessary staffing, and logistics such as scheduling in place."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Multiple math tutoring approaches, including group and virtual tutoring, can boost students' math knowledge in grades 4–10 — related
- A portfolio of eight math tutoring programs showed positive and meaningful average effects on student math knowledge, perceptions, and beliefs — related
- Saga tutoring impacts were larger in schools with fewer staffing challenges and in tutoring groups of two students or fewer — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Strong student–tutor relationships and a sense of belonging characterized tutoring programs with high attendance and positive learning effects — related
- In real-world implementation, TSI students attended on average 25.5 of 50 scheduled tutoring sessions — related
- Treatment effects were not moderated by emergent bilingual status, pretest levels, or tutoring attendance — reports the opposite
- Exploratory analyses: students ending the year in larger tutoring groups showed the largest math score increases but reported weaker tutor relationships than peers in smaller groups — related
- The brief compares the scale and impact of summer school with other interventions such as tutoring — related
- The brief evaluates how summer program design and implementation aligned with recommended best practices — related
- Tutoring programs consistently outperform common school-based alternatives such as class-size reduction and summer school, per the review's synthesis of Kraft — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tutoring-effect-size-aligned-with-implementation-quality |
title |
The size of tutoring programs' effects on student math knowledge aligned with the quality of their implementation |
description |
The size of tutoring programs' effects on student math knowledge aligned with the quality of their implementation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kate-place-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.