Claims

The evidence base for Twelve Together is a single randomized controlled trial that met WWC standards only with reservations due to differential attrition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? One study (Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998), a randomized controlled trial with 219 students, met WWC evidence standards with reservations because of differential attrition between the intervention and control groups; a second study did not meet WWC evidence screens. → What Works Clearinghouse 2007

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2007

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2007). WWC Intervention Report: Twelve Together. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc

q3 · i? · review · r?

The WWC reviewed two studies of Twelve Together. The Dynarski et al. (1998) RCT met standards with reservations; survey response rates were 92% for the intervention group and 86% for the control, exceeding the 5% differential attrition threshold. The other study (Orr, 1987) failed screens for baseline equivalence.

"One study (Dynarski, Gleason, Rangarajan, & Wood, 1998) was a randomized controlled trial that met WWC evidence- standards with reservations because of differential attrition between the intervention and control groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id twelve-together-single-rct-attrition-reservations
title The evidence base for Twelve Together is a single randomized controlled trial that met WWC standards only with reservations due to differential attrition
description The evidence base for Twelve Together is a single randomized controlled trial that met WWC standards only with reservations due to differential attrition
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2007
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2007

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.