Metacognitive awareness among multidisciplinary university students emerges as two dimensions: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of an 18-item MAI in a multidisciplinary higher education sample indicated a two-factor solution corresponding to knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition. → Tuononen 2023
Evidence¶
Tuononen 2023¶
Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students' learning profiles. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09314-x
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Factor analysis of the shortened 18-item MAI administered with the HowULearn questionnaire to 462 third-year students. Parallel analysis and MAP test supported two factors; the subsequent CFA showed RMSEA = 0.083 with "the values of the CFI and the TLI remained modest" (CFI 0.855, TLI 0.82), and Cronbach's alphas were 0.83 and 0.84.
"Both the parallel analysis and the MAP test indicated a two-factor solution, which is in line with previous studies (Harrison & Vallin, 2018; Schraw & Dennison, 1994). All loadings were above the desired 0.32 mark"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both metacognitive awareness dimensions correlate positively with deep approach and organized studying and negatively with an unreflective approach — related
- Students rate their knowledge about cognition higher than their regulation of cognition — related
- The metacognitive scale yields two factors: Global/Monitoring and Problem Solving — related
- Playful study design is measured as a two-dimensional construct of designing fun and designing competition, supported by exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses — related
- The dissonant profile scores lowest of all profiles on knowledge about cognition, but does not differ from the unorganized-deep profile on regulation of cognition — related
- A task-specific multiple-text strategy inventory yields two correlated strategy dimensions: cross-text elaboration and accumulation of information — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
two-dimensions-metacognitive-awareness-university-students |
title |
Metacognitive awareness among multidisciplinary university students emerges as two dimensions: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition |
description |
Metacognitive awareness among multidisciplinary university students emerges as two dimensions: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tuononen-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.