The metacognitive scale yields two factors: Global/Monitoring and Problem Solving¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses defined two factors underlying the metacognitive scale. → Burin 2020

Evidence¶

Burin 2020¶

Burin, Debora Ines; Gonzalez, Federico Martin; Barreyro, Juan Pablo; Injoque Ricle, Irene. (2020). Metacognitive regulation contributes to digital text comprehension in E-learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09226-8

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Factor analyses of the metacognitive inventory completed by the 219 students after the comprehension tasks. The article reports that "Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses defined two factors underlying the metacognitive scale": Global/Monitoring and Problem Solving; no effect sizes are printed.

"Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses defined two factors underlying the metacognitive scale, Global/Monitoring, including having in mind the task purpose, re-reading and paying attention to important or difficult parts, and Problem Solving in disorientation or lack of understanding, and the use of typography and navigation elements as comprehension aids."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Self-reported metacognitive regulation of reading contributes to expository digital text comprehension in a home e-learning environment — related
• The MAKQ self-knowledge items show a stable two-factor structure: meta-attention control (15 items) and meta-attention monitoring (5 items) — related
• Metacognitive awareness among multidisciplinary university students emerges as two dimensions: knowledge about cognition and regulation of cognition — related
• A task-specific multiple-text strategy inventory yields two correlated strategy dimensions: cross-text elaboration and accumulation of information — related