Two years of comprehensive teacher induction can boost student achievement compared with business-as-usual induction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Compared to business-as-usual induction programs, two years of comprehensive induction can boost student achievement. → Glazerman 2010
Evidence¶
Glazerman 2010¶
Glazerman, S., Isenberg, E., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Grider, M., & Jacobus, M. (2010). Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Final results of Mathematica's national randomized controlled evaluation of comprehensive teacher induction report that, relative to business-as-usual induction, "two years of comprehensive induction can boost student achievement." No effect size is printed on the page.
"Final results from Mathematica's national evaluation show that compared to business-as-usual induction programs, two years of comprehensive induction can boost student achievement."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not lead to measurable improvements in student test scores compared to business-as-usual induction in the second year of a randomized controlled study — reports the opposite
- Comprehensive teacher induction showed no impacts on outcomes other than student achievement — related
- One year of comprehensive teacher induction showed no impact on student achievement — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not measurably increase the percentage of teachers remaining in their district or in the profession compared to business-as-usual induction — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not measurably improve the qualifications of teachers who were retained compared to business-as-usual induction — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction produced no significant improvements in classroom practices in year 1 — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction produced no measurable improvements whether delivered as a one-year or two-year program — reports the opposite
- Mathematica is examining whether high-intensity teacher induction programs lead to higher retention rates and other positive teacher and student outcomes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
two-year-comprehensive-induction-boosts-achievement |
title |
Two years of comprehensive teacher induction can boost student achievement compared with business-as-usual induction |
description |
Two years of comprehensive teacher induction can boost student achievement compared with business-as-usual induction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — glazerman-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.