Comprehensive teacher induction showed no impacts on outcomes other than student achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The study found no impacts on outcomes other than student achievement. → Glazerman 2010
Evidence¶
Glazerman 2010¶
Glazerman, S., Isenberg, E., Dolfin, S., Bleeker, M., Johnson, A., Grider, M., & Jacobus, M. (2010). Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results from a Randomized Controlled Study. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/
q3 · i? · causal · r?
The national randomized controlled evaluation reports null findings beyond achievement: "The study found no impacts on other outcomes." The page does not enumerate which other outcomes were measured or print effect sizes.
"The study found no impacts on other outcomes."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Comprehensive teacher induction generated no significant improvements in novice teachers' classroom practices in the first year — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not increase teacher retention during novice teachers' first year — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- One year of comprehensive teacher induction showed no impact on student achievement — related
- Two years of comprehensive teacher induction can boost student achievement compared with business-as-usual induction — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not measurably increase the percentage of teachers remaining in their district or in the profession compared to business-as-usual induction — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Mathematica is examining whether high-intensity teacher induction programs lead to higher retention rates and other positive teacher and student outcomes — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction produced no measurable improvements whether delivered as a one-year or two-year program — related
- Comprehensive teacher induction did not lead to measurable improvements in student test scores compared to business-as-usual induction in the second year of a randomized controlled study — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
induction-no-other-outcome-impacts |
title |
Comprehensive teacher induction showed no impacts on outcomes other than student achievement |
description |
Comprehensive teacher induction showed no impacts on outcomes other than student achievement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — glazerman-2010 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.