Claims

Many ultrasound examination types, such as thyroid, neck, breast and prostate, have not been evaluated in primary studies of distance-learning techniques

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The review identifies a coverage gap: many types of ultrasound examinations have not been evaluated in primary studies on distance-learning techniques. → Duarte ML 2022

Evidence

Duarte ML 2022

Duarte ML, dos Santos LR, Iared W, Peccin MS. (2022). Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. São Paulo Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-3180.2021.1047.R.19052022

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Stated limitation of the systematic review. The review also reports that because of the variability of outcomes between studies, performing a meta-analysis was not possible.

"One limitation of this systematic review was that it seemed that many types of ultrasound examinations have not been evaluated in primary studies on distance-learning techniques in the medical literature, such as examinations on the thyroid, neck, breasts and prostate."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.