Claims

Uncertainty types across the three reasoning domains were found to interrelate in students' citizen science activity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The case study suggests interrelations between statistical, scientific and nature of science uncertainty articulations. → Aridor 2023

Evidence

Aridor 2023

Aridor, K., Dvir, M., Tsybulsky, D., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2023). Living the DReaM: The interrelations between statistical, scientific and nature of science uncertainty articulations through citizen science. Instr Sci, 51, 729–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09626-8

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Authors' interpretive discussion of the case study. The discussion "suggests interrelations between them in a more extended depiction of the DReaM framework", extending the framework beyond its initial presentation.

"The discussion depicts how these sub-categories manifested in this particular case study and suggests interrelations between them in a more extended depiction of the DReaM framework."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id uncertainty-types-interrelate-citizen-science
title Uncertainty types across the three reasoning domains were found to interrelate in students' citizen science activity
description Uncertainty types across the three reasoning domains were found to interrelate in students' citizen science activity
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — aridor-2023

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.