Claims

Uncriticalness on hard novel tasks appears as many wrong answers relative to omissions and as eagerness to learn answers from authority rather than one's own checks

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 1922 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Impulsiveness and uncriticalness were witnessed by the large number of wrong answers in comparison with omissions or confessions of inability. → Thorndike 1922 q1 i? In a test question on field intensity, a correct number answer was given six times but the unit name was correct only once. → Thorndike 1922 (2)

Evidence

Thorndike 1922

Thorndike, E. L., & Upton, C. B. (1922). An Experiment in Learning an Abstract Subject. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065229

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Qualitative analysis of the adults' written work: the ratio of wrong answers to omissions or confessions of inability is offered as evidence of uncriticalness, with few answers carrying any expression of doubt.

"Impulsiveness and uncriticalness are witnessed further by the large number of wrong answers in comparison with the number of omissions or confessions of inability."

Thorndike 1922 (2)

Thorndike, E. L., & Upton, C. B. (1922). An Experiment in Learning an Abstract Subject. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0065229

q1 · i? · causal · r1

From the 12-minute test: one question "received a correct number answer six times but the name was correct only once," cited as evidence of general mental confusion in attaching names to answer numbers.

"the question: "What is the intensity of the magnetic field due to a unit pole at a distance of .001 cm.?" received a correct number answer six times but the name was correct only once."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id uncriticalness-wrong-answers-versus-omissions
title Uncriticalness on hard novel tasks appears as many wrong answers relative to omissions and as eagerness to learn answers from authority rather than one's own checks
description Uncriticalness on hard novel tasks appears as many wrong answers relative to omissions and as eagerness to learn answers from authority rather than one's own checks
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 1922
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — thorndike-1922, thorndike-1922-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.