Claims

The Unstructured Bureaucratic institutional type is the least enabling context for elearning, showing little evidence of either top-down or bottom-up change

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Unstructured Bureaucratic institution had the lowest course use (33% of students), lowest student frequency (18% above average), lowest staff frequency (35%), and lowest student variety (3%). → Czerniewicz 2009 q2 i? The authors conclude there is little evidence of either top-down or bottom-up change regarding ICT use for teaching and learning at the Unstructured Bureaucratic type. → Czerniewicz 2009 (2)

Evidence

Czerniewicz 2009

Czerniewicz, L. & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and elearning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education, 53, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.006

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Authors' synthesis of the frequency findings (section 4.4); an interpretive statement grounded in the descriptive survey percentages reported for staff and students.

"In both cases use was the lowest in the Unstructured Bureaucratic institution suggesting that this is the least enabling context of the three represented here."

Czerniewicz 2009 (2)

Czerniewicz, L. & Brown, C. (2009). A study of the relationship between institutional policy, organisational culture and elearning use in four South African universities. Computers & Education, 53, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.006

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Discussion-section interpretation (section 5) about the Unstructured Bureaucratic type: no critical mass, no sense of ownership or agency, and staff hampered by institutional processes and lack of support.

"There is little evidence of either top down or bottom up change with regard the use of ICTs for teaching and learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id unstructured-bureaucracy-least-enabling
title The Unstructured Bureaucratic institutional type is the least enabling context for elearning, showing little evidence of either top-down or bottom-up change
description The Unstructured Bureaucratic institutional type is the least enabling context for elearning, showing little evidence of either top-down or bottom-up change
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2009
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — czerniewicz-2009, czerniewicz-2009-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.