93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2011 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning. → Bath-Hextall Fiona 2011

Evidence¶

Bath-Hextall Fiona 2011¶

Bath-Hextall Fiona, Wharrad Heather, Leonardi-Bee Jo. (2011). Teaching tools in Evidence Based Practice: evaluation of reusable learning objects (RLOs) for learning about Meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3123313/

q2 · i? · design · r3

Descriptive percentage from the student evaluation; the abstract states "93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning". No statistical test is reported for this figure.

"Whilst the media components of the RLOs such as animations helped most students (86%) understand concepts including for example Forest plots, 93% of students rated usability and control as important to their learning."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In the pilot, 93% of students found controlling the wave in the air natural and 86% reported feeling more engaged and focused than in regular learning — related
• After design adjustments, the LAD achieved good–excellent usability (SUS M = 4.13, equal to 78.25%) — a broader claim this one bears on
• Learner acceptance of AI simulations is generally high, with System Usability Scale scores of 61.6 to 78.56 and 72%-93% willingness to recommend — a broader claim this one bears on
• EVS usability scores above 'good' benchmark but students become more critical of usability when encountering staff competency or testing problems — related
• Participants rated SOPHIE 2.0 as engaging, easy to use, and clinically relevant in a self-service format — related