Claims

Expert instructor presence, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies were the most common instructional design features

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The most prevalent instructional design features across all Kirkpatrick levels were expert instructor presence, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies. → Sekhavati P 2025

Evidence

Sekhavati P 2025

Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527

q3 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis across 62 included studies found "the presence of an expert instructor during simulation training, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies were the instructional design features used most commonly across all Kirkpatrick levels".

"The presence of an expert instructor during simulation training, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies were the instructional design features used most commonly across all Kirkpatrick levels, with many studies showing statistically significant improvements when these features were utilised."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.