Isolated feature comparisons: multiple learning strategies with repetitive practice increased self‐reported block success, and AI‐assisted nerve identification reduced patient complications¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Niazi et al. found a 1‐hour simulation using multiple learning strategies and repetitive practice significantly increased self‐reported block success versus didactics alone. → Sekhavati P 2025
q2 i? Cai et al. found an AI‐assisted nerve identification system decreased patient complication rates versus traditional teaching on part‐task trainers. → Sekhavati P 2025 (2)
Evidence¶
Sekhavati P 2025¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
The review reports, citing Niazi et al., a comparison of simulation with "multiple learning strategies (didactics plus simulation) and repetitive practice" against didactics alone, showing a significant increase in self‐reported block success.
"Niazi et al. compared the effectiveness of a 1‐hour simulation that utilised multiple learning strategies (didactics plus simulation) and repetitive practice to didactics alone on a part‐task trainer, and showed a significant increase in self‐reported block success [25]."
Sekhavati P 2025 (2)¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports, citing Cai et al., that an "artificial intelligence‐assisted nerve identification system for simulated education decreased patient complication rates compared with traditional teaching on part‐task trainers".
"Cai et al. showed that an artificial intelligence‐assisted nerve identification system for simulated education decreased patient complication rates compared with traditional teaching on part‐task trainers [26]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- IONM-based education lowered recurrent laryngeal nerve injury rates and enhanced procedural standardization — related
- Expert instructor presence, repetitive practice and multiple learning strategies were the most common instructional design features — related
- Simulation Based Education Improves Outcomes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Cook et al. found multiple learning strategies was the only instructional design feature with a significantly positive pooled effect on Kirkpatrick level 4 patient outcomes (0.53, p < 0.001) — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.