Technology augmentation studies, including needle tip tracking, all found significant improvement in skill outcomes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Among studies controlling for technology augmentation, needle tip tracking as an education tool was examined with all studies finding significant improvement in skill outcomes. → Sekhavati P 2025
Evidence¶
Sekhavati P 2025¶
Sekhavati P, Wild T, Martinez IDPC, Dion PM, Woo M, Ramlogan R, Boet S, Shorr R, Gu Y. (2025). Instructional design features in ultrasound‐guided regional anaesthesia simulation‐based training: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.16527
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's narrative synthesis of studies controlling for technology augmentation reports that "needle tip tracking was examined as an education tool, with all studies finding significant improvement in skill outcomes".
"Among these, needle tip tracking was examined as an education tool, with all studies finding significant improvement in skill outcomes [27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Software-based platforms generally improve examination scores, diagnostic accuracy, and decision-making performance — a broader claim this one bears on
- In the Dots and Needles task, higher entropy of the nondominant eye's pupil diameter is associated with lower performance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.