Utility value manipulation, but not choice, increases voluntary requests for statistics resources, a behavioral indicator of emerging individual interest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The directly-communicated utility value manipulation increased the odds of requesting regression resources by 1.35 times relative to control (OR = 1.35, p = .042); the choice manipulation had no influence (OR = 1.02, p = .885). → Asher 2025
Evidence¶
Asher 2025¶
Asher, M. W., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2025). Using Choice and Utility Value to Promote Interest: Stimulating Situational Interest in a Lesson and Fostering the Development of Interest in Statistics. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000921
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Meta-analyzed logistic regression of the binary resource-request outcome across Studies 1–7. The utility value manipulation "increased the odds that participants requested regression resources by 1.35 times relative to control, OR = 1.35, p = .042"; 39.2% of utility value participants versus 33.2% of controls requested resources.
"the directly-communicated utility value manipulation increased the odds that participants requested regression resources by 1.35 times relative to control, OR = 1.35, p = .042, suggesting that the manipulation promoted emerging individual interest in statistics."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Interest — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Effects on maintained situational interest and resource requests are mediated by perceived utility value (utility value manipulation) and perceived autonomy and triggered interest (choice manipulation) — related
- Neither choice nor utility value manipulations improve end-of-session regression test performance, and the two manipulations do not interact — related
- Directly-communicated utility value increases beliefs about the usefulness of regression, unmoderated by baseline confidence or interest — related
- Providing meaningful choice during a lesson increases perceived autonomy and triggered situational interest in undergraduates learning statistics — related
- Both choice and utility value manipulations increase maintained situational interest in regression by similar small amounts — related
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.