Claims

Directly-communicated utility value increases beliefs about the usefulness of regression, unmoderated by baseline confidence or interest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The directly-communicated utility value manipulation increased reported beliefs about the usefulness of regression by over .4 standard deviations (d = 0.41, p < .001), with no significant interactions with baseline confidence or interest. → Asher 2025

Evidence

Asher 2025

Asher, M. W., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2025). Using Choice and Utility Value to Promote Interest: Stimulating Situational Interest in a Lesson and Fostering the Development of Interest in Statistics. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000921

q3 · i2 · causal · r?

Meta-regression across Studies 1–7 of the D-UV contrast on utility value perceptions. The manipulation "increasing reported beliefs by over .4 standard deviations relative to control, d = 0.41, p < .001"; interactions with baseline confidence and interest were non-significant (ps ≥ .474).

"the directly-communicated utility value manipulation had a strong, positive effect on participants’ beliefs about the usefulness of regression, increasing reported beliefs by over .4 standard deviations relative to control, d = 0.41, p < .001. This overall effect was unmoderated"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.