Experimental and control classes had equivalent pretest narrative writing scores before treatment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Pretest means were similar in the experimental class (66.03) and the control class (67.19), which the authors take as equal initial ability. → Kusumawarti 2020
Evidence¶
Kusumawarti 2020¶
Kusumawarti, E., Subiyantoro, S., & Rukayah. (2020). The Effectiveness of Visualization, Auditory, Kinesthetic (VAK) Model toward Writing Narrative: Linguistic Intelligence Perspective. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 677-694. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13442a
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Descriptive analysis of pretest scores (Table 1) in the quasi-experimental study: experimental class mean 66.03 (SD 3.29, n=61), control class mean 67.19 (SD 3.83, n=53). The equivalence statement is descriptive; no statistical test of pretest differences is reported.
"the average score of the pretest is not much different, namely in the experimental class 66.03 and the control class 67.19. Pretest results show that the class used in this study has the same initial ability."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The two groups did not differ significantly in writing quality before the treatment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Before treatment, the experimental and control groups showed no significant difference in overall language proficiency — related
- The experimental and control classes did not differ significantly on the listening pre-test — related
- The lecture and academic controversy groups showed no significant difference in TUCE pretest scores, indicating equivalent prior economic knowledge — related
- Before treatment, the Logo and control groups showed no statistically significant difference in achievement on two-dimensional shapes — related
- The control and experimental groups showed no significant difference in writing performance on the first draft — related
- Initial physics ability differed between the two experimental groups before treatment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.