Claims

Laboratory lessons supported by the virtual chemistry laboratory were rated as more constructivist than the same teacher's real-laboratory lessons

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? With the same teacher (Teacher D), laboratory lessons using VCL with the experimental group scored 93.6 (constructivist) while real-laboratory lessons with CG-II scored 46.0 (close to traditional) on the teaching-philosophy observation measure. → Zeynep Tatli & Alipasa Ayas 2012

Evidence

Zeynep Tatli & Alipasa Ayas 2012

Zeynep Tatli & Alipasa Ayas. (2012). Virtual Chemistry Laboratory: Effect of Constructivist Learning Environment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 13(1). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tojde

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Observational analysis during the chemical changes unit: lessons of both control groups and the experimental group were observed for 11 lesson-hours each and scored with a semi-structured teaching-philosophy form (traditional 1 to constructivist 4). Table 4 shows Teacher D's laboratory mean was 93.6 (C) with EG versus 46.0 (CT) with CG-II; classroom means were 69.3 and 76.0 (both CC).

"It is seen that teacher D’s “close to traditional” with CG -II group in laboratory lessons, and “constructivist” with EG students in laboratory lessons."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.