Claims

Vicarious failure with high solution diversity is as effective as engaging in Productive Failure oneself for conceptual knowledge acquisition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? VF-high did not differ significantly from PF on conceptual knowledge posttest scores (p =.193), with VF-high descriptively even outperforming PF. → Thomas C. Braas 2025

Evidence

Thomas C. Braas 2025

Thomas C. Braas, Christian Hartmann, Vincent Hoogerheide, Nikol Rummel, Tamara van Gog. (2025). When is observing failure productive? Investigating the role of solution diversity in vicarious failure. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09706-x

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the same randomized four-condition experiment, Bonferroni-corrected post-hoc comparison of VF-high versus PF on conceptual knowledge was non-significant; the article reports "did not differ significantly from students who engaged in PF themselves" with d = 0.292 favoring VF-high descriptively.

"students in the VF-high condition, who were presented with a high-diversity modeling example of the PF-generation process, did not differ significantly from students who engaged in PF themselves (p =.193, 95% CI [-0.79, 0.17], Cohen’s d = 0.292), and even outperformed PF in descriptive terms."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id vf-high-as-effective-as-pf
title Vicarious failure with high solution diversity is as effective as engaging in Productive Failure oneself for conceptual knowledge acquisition
description Vicarious failure with high solution diversity is as effective as engaging in Productive Failure oneself for conceptual knowledge acquisition
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — thomas-c-braas-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.