Claims

Prior knowledge moderated the VF-process advantage over PF: the benefit of observing the process grew with prior knowledge, while prior knowledge did not affect post-test performance in the PF condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Condition interacted with prior knowledge on conceptual knowledge (F(2, 166) = 3.13, p = 0.047); the moderation coefficient was b 3 = 0.34, p = 0.011. → Christian Hartmann 2021 q3 i3 Within conditions, prior knowledge correlated strongly with conceptual post-test performance in VF-process (r = 0.53) but not in PF (r = 0.13, non-significant). → Christian Hartmann 2021 (2)

Evidence

Christian Hartmann 2021

Christian Hartmann, Tamara van Gog, Nikol Rummel. (2021). Preparatory effects of problem solving versus studying examples prior to instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09528-z

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Regression moderation analysis (PROCESS Model 1) following up the significant condition × prior knowledge interaction, F(2, 166) = 3.13, p = 0.047, found "prior knowledge significantly moderated the effect on conceptual knowledge in the PF and the VF-process conditions, b 3 = 0.34, p = 0.011". No standardised effect size was printed for the moderation.

"prior knowledge significantly moderated the effect on conceptual knowledge in the PF and the VF-process conditions, b 3 = 0.34, p = 0.011"

Christian Hartmann 2021 (2)

Christian Hartmann, Tamara van Gog, Nikol Rummel. (2021). Preparatory effects of problem solving versus studying examples prior to instruction. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09528-z

q3 · i3 · causal · r2

Follow-up simple-correlation analyses within conditions: in VF-process prior knowledge correlated with the conceptual post-test at r = 0.53, p < 0.001 (a large printed effect size), whereas in PF the correlation was r = 0.13, p = 0.345 and not significant.

"While prior knowledge did not affect the post-test performance in the PF condition, r(55) = 0.13, p = 0.345, students in the VF-process condition gained more from observing the process when they had higher prior knowledge, r(56) = 0.53, p < 0.001"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id prior-knowledge-moderates-vf-process-vs-pf
title Prior knowledge moderated the VF-process advantage over PF: the benefit of observing the process grew with prior knowledge, while prior knowledge did not affect post-test performance in the PF condition
description Prior knowledge moderated the VF-process advantage over PF: the benefit of observing the process grew with prior knowledge, while prior knowledge did not affect post-test performance in the PF condition
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
source_checked 2026-10-19
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — christian-hartmann-2021, christian-hartmann-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.