Claims

Video-based listening instruction produced a larger score improvement than audio-based instruction in an Indonesian EFL high-school experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Both the video and audio groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test, but the video group's mean improvement (21 points) was more than 2.5 times the audio group's (8 points). → Yasin 2018

Evidence

Yasin 2018

Yasin, B., Mustafa, F., & Permatasari, R. (2018). How Much Videos Win Over Audios in Listening Instruction for EFL Learners. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1165770

q3 · i? · causal · r2

True experimental pre-test/post-test control-group study with 32 eleventh-grade students per group, selected by cluster random sampling from 288 students in Banda Aceh. Both groups started at a mean of 48; the video group's "improved by 21 points" versus 8 for audio, with paired-samples t-tests significant at 0.000 for both groups.

"After the treatments, however, the mean of the video group improved by 21 points, while that of the audio group only improved by 8 points. Even though the two groups both performed better in the post-test, the improvement of the video group was more than 2.5 times higher than that of the audio group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.