Claims

Groups were equivalent at pre-test but differed significantly at post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? No significant difference between groups at pre-test (t = 0.27, p > 0.05), but a significant difference at post-test (t = 6.15, p < 0.05) favoring the experimental group. → Thiyagu 2014

Evidence

Thiyagu 2014

K. Thiyagu. (2014). Effectiveness of Video Podcast in Learning Psychology among Bachelor of Education Students. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1097634

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-test/post-test comparison in the 48-student equivalent group design. Pre-test means were nearly equal (20.00 vs 20.29), confirming group equivalence. Post-test means differed significantly (30.29 vs 39.12), with "the experimental group performed better than the control group in their post test."

"the obtained 't' value 0.27 is less than the critical value at 0.05 level of significance and hence, the null hypothesis is accepted"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.