Raters of a videotaped fracture-scenario OSCE showed high internal consistency but only moderate inter-rater reliability across subspecialties and seniority levels¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2–q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A videotaped OSCE rater study found high construct validity, moderate inter-rater reliability, and high internal consistency. → El Sherif Reem 2024
q3 i? The findings suggest the rater need not be a specific person, making OSCEs more accessible and practical to run. → El Sherif Reem 2024 (2)
Evidence¶
El Sherif Reem 2024¶
El Sherif Reem, Shrier Ian, Paul-Tellier Pierre, Rodriguez Charo. (2024). What do we know about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Sport and Exercise Medicine? A scoping review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77841
q3 · i? · review · r2
Quantitative descriptive study (Chen 2013) using a videotaped OSCE in a fracture scenario, with raters from different subspecialties and seniority levels assessing at three time points. The review reports "moderate inter-rater reliability" and high internal consistency; no standardised effect size is printed.
"Calculations revealed high construct validity, moderate inter-rater reliability, and high internal consistency."
El Sherif Reem 2024 (2)¶
El Sherif Reem, Shrier Ian, Paul-Tellier Pierre, Rodriguez Charo. (2024). What do we know about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Sport and Exercise Medicine? A scoping review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77841
q2 · i? · review · r2
Authors' interpretation of the videotaped-OSCE rater study, as reported in the review: rater flexibility makes the OSCE "more accessible and practical to run". This is an interpretive statement, not a tested result.
"These findings suggest that the rater does not necessarily have to be a specific person and this finding make an OSCE more accessible and practical to run."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Only a small fraction of published OSCE research in musculoskeletal and sport medicine was actually conducted in a Sport and Exercise Medicine setting — related
- Rubrics enhance grading consistency and inter-rater reliability in dental education assessment — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.