Only a small fraction of published OSCE research in musculoskeletal and sport medicine was actually conducted in a Sport and Exercise Medicine setting¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of 22 included studies, only six were developed in a SEM setting and five of those came from one author in one setting. → El Sherif Reem 2024
Evidence¶
El Sherif Reem 2024¶
El Sherif Reem, Shrier Ian, Paul-Tellier Pierre, Rodriguez Charo. (2024). What do we know about Objective Structured Clinical Examination in Sport and Exercise Medicine? A scoping review. Canadian Medical Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.77841
q2 · i? · review · r2
Qualitative meta-summary of a scoping review that screened 469 unique abstracts and included 22 studies. The review reports that "only six out of the 22 studies" were set in SEM, with five from a single author. No effect size is printed.
"only six out of the 22 studies included in this review were developed in a SEM setting, and five of those were conducted by the same author in the same setting"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Candidates receiving additional musculoskeletal training (lectures, workshops, video, spaced education, or SCIM) scored higher or similar on OSCEs compared with controls — related
- A six-station sport medicine OSCE showed high reliability and construct validity, with senior residents outscoring junior residents — related
- Teaching musculoskeletal examination skills by trained patient educators produced no significant OSCE score difference compared with physician teaching — related
- Raters of a videotaped fracture-scenario OSCE showed high internal consistency but only moderate inter-rater reliability across subspecialties and seniority levels — related
- The Modified Angoff method was acceptable for setting different pass marks for senior and junior residents on the same OSCE — related
- Improvement in Orthopaedic In-Training Examination scores showed no significant correlation with OSCE scores — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.