Claims

The greatest impact of virtual or blended laboratories is in the cognitive domain and the least in the psychomotor domain

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Thirteen studies reported cognitive-domain improvements (knowledge acquisition, conceptual understanding, problem-solving), four reported affective gains, and three reported psychomotor skill enhancements. → Safaeipour Ruhollah 2025

Evidence

Safaeipour Ruhollah 2025

Safaeipour Ruhollah, Aalaa Maryam, Mojtahedzadeh Rita, Mohammadi Aeen, Asadzandi Shadi, Mousavi Atekeh. (2025). Virtual or blended laboratories for healthcare students education: a systematized review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07937-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review's Bloom's taxonomy synthesis of the 21 included studies reports cognitive-domain gains in "knowledge acquisition, conceptual understanding, problem-solving, and creative thinking" across thirteen studies; four studies covered the affective domain and three the psychomotor domain.

"Thirteen studies [4, 6, 28–30, 32–34, 36, 38, 41, 42, 44] reported improvements in knowledge acquisition, conceptual understanding, problem-solving, and creative thinking which indicating that virtual or blended laboratories can support higher-order cognitive skills, as well as the upper levels of Bloom's cognitive domain."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.