Most studies of virtual or blended laboratories report increased student satisfaction, though a minority report decreased or unchanged satisfaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Fourteen of the reviewed studies showed increased student satisfaction with virtual laboratories, one showed decreased satisfaction, and another found no effect. → Safaeipour Ruhollah 2025
Evidence¶
Safaeipour Ruhollah 2025¶
Safaeipour Ruhollah, Aalaa Maryam, Mojtahedzadeh Rita, Mohammadi Aeen, Asadzandi Shadi, Mousavi Atekeh. (2025). Virtual or blended laboratories for healthcare students education: a systematized review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07937-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review's satisfaction synthesis across 21 articles (satisfaction assessed in 16) reports that "one study showed decreased satisfaction, and another one did not suggest any significant effect," with variation attributed to study design, infrastructure, strategies, and student populations.
"Although most of the included studies (n = 14) reported increased student satisfaction with virtual or blended laboratories, one study showed decreased satisfaction [39], and another one did not suggest any significant effect [3]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.