Claims

The virtual material did not significantly improve knowledge permanency three weeks after the unit, while the control group's scores declined significantly

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group showed no statistically significant difference between post-test and permanency test achievement scores. → Taş 2015 q2 i? The control group showed a statistically significant decrease from post-test to permanency test. → Taş 2015 (2)

Evidence

Taş 2015

Erol Taş. (2015). The Effects of Activity and Gain Based Virtual Material on Student’s Success, Permanency and Attitudes towards Science Lesson. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.817

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Permanency test administered three weeks after the unit ended in the quasi-experiment with 35 students per group. Experimental group scores decreased slightly from 71.8857 to 68.6857, but "no statistically significant difference was found in the permanence of knowledge".

"When the permanence results of the experimental group students were examined, no statistically significant difference was found in the permanence of knowledge (t(69) = 1.033, p>0.05)."

Taş 2015 (2)

Erol Taş. (2015). The Effects of Activity and Gain Based Virtual Material on Student’s Success, Permanency and Attitudes towards Science Lesson. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i5.817

q2 · i? · causal · r2

In the same permanency comparison, control group post-test scores fell from 57.6000 to 50.0571 three weeks later; the article reports "a statistically negative difference was found in control group students" (t(69) = 2.736, p<0.05).

"However, a statistically negative difference was found in control group students (t(69) = 2.736, p<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.