Claims

At high WMC, children with math difficulties performed significantly better under visual-only strategy conditions relative to other conditions at Wave 4

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? When WMC was set to a high level, a Tukey test indicated a significant advantage for the visual-only condition for children with MD (visual-only > verbal-only > control > verbal + visual). → Swanson 2013

Evidence

Swanson 2013

Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco, M. J. (2013). Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children With Math Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 339–358. doi:10.1177/0022219413498771

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Wave 4 intent-to-treat analysis across testing waves; the Tukey test showed "a significant (ps < .05) advantage for the visual-only condition for children with MD" over the other three conditions.

"When treatment conditions were made conditional on setting WMC to a high level, a Tukey test indicated a significant (ps < .05) advantage for the visual-only condition for children with MD (visual-only > verbal-only > control > verbal + visual)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.