Claims

At high pretest WMC, the visual-only condition outperformed verbal-only, verbal+visual, and control on solution accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A Tukey test at the high WMC level yielded significant adjusted-mean differences in favor of visual-only over the other three conditions. → Swanson et al. 2013

Evidence

Swanson et al. 2013

H. Lee Swanson, Michael J. Orosco, Cathy Lussier. (2013). Does Cognitive Strategy Training on Word Problems Compensate for Working Memory Capacity in Children with Math Difficulties? SREE Spring 2013 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED563039

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Post-hoc comparison of adjusted posttest means at the high pretest WMC level (z = +.50), collapsed across ability group, in the randomized treatment study. Adjusted means were .68, .39, 1.12, and .26 for verbal-only, verbal+visual, visual-only, and control; the article reports "significant differences (ps < .05) in adjusted mean scores in favor of the visual-only condition".

"A Tukey test comparing the means yielded significant differences (ps < .05) in adjusted mean scores in favor of the visual-only condition (visual-only > verbal-only = verbal+visual=control)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.