Visual-spatial working memory predicts higher-order QNC (Level II/III) but not basic numerical skills, and is linked to Grade 3 math only indirectly¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2009 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The visual-spatial sketch pad did not significantly predict QNC Level I, but its path to QNC Level II/III became significant in the final restricted model. → Krajewski 2009
q3 i? In this longitudinal observational path model, visual-spatial working memory had no significant direct path to Grade 3 math achievement; its association ran indirectly through higher-order QNC (a path significant only in the reduced final model), which shows prediction, not that it causes math achievement. → Krajewski 2009
Evidence¶
Krajewski 2009¶
Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Exploring the impact of phonological awareness, visual-spatial working memory, and preschool quantity-number competencies on mathematics achievement in elementary school: Findings from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 516-531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009
q3 · i? · associational · r2
In the reduced final structural equation model (fit: Chi²[4] = 0.75, p = .95), the visual-spatial sketch pad's path to QNC Level II/III became significant at p < .01, whereas in the initial model it "did not significantly predict QNC Level I ( = .17, p > .05)".
"Interestingly, the paths from phonological awareness to QNC Level I and from visual-spatial sketch pad to QNC Level II/III became significant (p < .01) in this restricted model."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Spatial Ability — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Visual Processing — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Phonological awareness has no direct effect on higher-order QNC (Level II and above) or Grade 3 math achievement once QNC skills are modeled, confirming the isolated number-words hypothesis — related
- QNC Level I predicts QNC Level II/III, which in turn predicts Grade 3 mathematics achievement; QNC Level I also retains a direct path to Grade 3 math — related
- Visuospatial memory did not predict word reading achievement in any grade, providing a discriminative contrast with mathematics — related
- Verbal working memory directly and positively predicts math performance in grades 3 and 4 — related
- Previous domain knowledge accounts for most of the variance in later achievement, considerably reducing the predictive impact of IQ and WM — related
- Working memory fully mediates the effects of math anxiety and attention on children's non-verbal Numerical Operations — related
- Kindergarten phonological awareness explains about 34% of the variance in basic numerical skills (QNC Level I) one year later — related
- Spatial ability predicts algebra word problem performance above and beyond its general relation to mathematics ability — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
visuospatial-sketchpad-predicts-higher-qnc |
title |
Visual-spatial working memory predicts higher-order QNC (Level II/III) but not basic numerical skills, and is linked to Grade 3 math only indirectly |
description |
Visual-spatial working memory predicts higher-order QNC (Level II/III) but not basic numerical skills, and is linked to Grade 3 math only indirectly |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2009 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — krajewski-2009 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.