Claims

Video modeling interventions yield strong or moderate treatment effects in 56% of reviewed studies of students with EBD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of the 16 reviewed studies for which PND could be calculated, 6 yielded a strong treatment effect, 3 a moderate effect, 4 questionable, and 3 unreliable; 56% of studies indicated strong or moderate treatment effect. → Elias Clinton 2016

Evidence

Elias Clinton 2016

Elias Clinton. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders. Educational Research Quarterly, 40(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166705

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Meta-analysis of 19 studies (88 total participants) of video modeling for students with EBD, aggregating single-subject outcomes with PND. The synthesis reports "56% of the stu dies indicated a strong or moderate treatment effect" and 43% questionable or unreliable, indicating variable treatment effects.

"Of the 16 reviewed studies for which PND could be calculated, 6 yielded a strong treatment effect, 3 yielded a moderate treatment effect, 4 yielded a questionable treatment effect, and 3 yielded an unreliable treatment effect. In sum, 56% of the stu dies indicated a strong or moderate treatment effect, and 43% of examined studies indicated a questionable or unreliable treatment effect"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.