Video modeling interventions yield strong or moderate treatment effects in 56% of reviewed studies of students with EBD¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Of the 16 reviewed studies for which PND could be calculated, 6 yielded a strong treatment effect, 3 a moderate effect, 4 questionable, and 3 unreliable; 56% of studies indicated strong or moderate treatment effect. → Elias Clinton 2016
Evidence¶
Elias Clinton 2016¶
Elias Clinton. (2016). A Meta-Analysis of Video Modeling Interventions for Children and Adolescents with Emotional/Behavioral Disorders. Educational Research Quarterly, 40(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1166705
q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1
Meta-analysis of 19 studies (88 total participants) of video modeling for students with EBD, aggregating single-subject outcomes with PND. The synthesis reports "56% of the stu dies indicated a strong or moderate treatment effect" and 43% questionable or unreliable, indicating variable treatment effects.
"Of the 16 reviewed studies for which PND could be calculated, 6 yielded a strong treatment effect, 3 yielded a moderate treatment effect, 4 yielded a questionable treatment effect, and 3 yielded an unreliable treatment effect. In sum, 56% of the stu dies indicated a strong or moderate treatment effect, and 43% of examined studies indicated a questionable or unreliable treatment effect"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.