Claims

Conducting maintenance and generalization phases was significantly associated with higher PND scores than treatment-only cases

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? PND size was significantly affected by conducted phases, H(3) = 12.4, p = .006, with treatment-only cases significantly lower than all-three-phase cases, U = -36.3, p = .006. → Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017

Evidence

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm 2017

Jemma Kim & Christina H. Kimm. (2017). Functional Technology for Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities: Meta-Analysis of Mobile Device-Based Interventions. The Journal of Special Education Apprenticeship, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1149575

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Kruskal-Wallis test across phase conditions among the 140 observed cases, followed by a Mann-Whitney comparison; treatment-only mean PND was 84.7 versus 98.9 for cases with treatment, maintenance, and generalization phases.

"PND size was significantly affected by conducted p hases, H (3) = 12.4, p= . 006. Mann-Whitney test was used to follow up this finding and PND size , when only treatment phase was conducted, was significantly lower than when all three phases were conducted, U=-36.3, p=.006."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.