In the experimental group, vocabulary was the largest stepwise-regression contributor to writing achievement (90% partial contribution)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Stepwise regression attributed 90.0% of writing achievement to vocabulary, with organization 5%, mechanic 2.1%, grammar 1.1%, and fluency 1%. → Iman 2017
Evidence¶
Iman 2017¶
Jaya Nur IMAN. (2017). A QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON USING SHORT STORIES: STATISTICAL AND INFERENTIAL ANALYSES ON THE NON-ENGLISH MAJOR UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' SPEAKING AND WRITING ACHIEVEMENTS. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1719
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Stepwise regression analysis of the experimental group's analytical writing rubric aspect scores (grammar, vocabulary, mechanic, organisation, fluency) against total writing achievement. The article reports whole-aspect influence as 100% and per-aspect correlations (0.953 for vocabulary); no standardised effect size is printed.
"the partial contribution of each aspect of writing skill toward writing achievement was 90.0%% for vocabulary, 5% for organization, 2.1% for mechanic, 1.1 % for grammar, and 1% for fluency"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Writing Skills — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.